Monday, January 23, 2012

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Lowest budget gear

We're often asked by students what kind of gear to get, in order to make movies at a very low budget level.

Here are some suggestions (which are not meant as endorsements or guarantees, of course, and we have no affiliations, bla bla, and the camera will be superseded by a better, cheaper one in about five minutes)...


Those are the absolute basic tools for making a movie. It helps to know how to use them, but you'll figure that out.

- PH

Friday, December 9, 2011

Zsolt Bognar and Friends - Episode 2: Joe Patrych


A great new episode of this series, featuring Grammy-nominated recording producer Joe Patrych, who dishes about behind the scenes stuff in the classical world!

Monday, September 12, 2011

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Color Grading "Bridge of Names" at Fini

Just finished color grading our feature, "Bridge of Names," at Fini, with Patrick Inhofer using DaVinci Resolve 8 at the helm of what looks like the Starship Enterprise...


Patrick did an incredible job. He was sweet, he was patient, and he was completely open to our suggestions, while having strong ideas of his own.

His wife and business manager, Pam, was a perfect hostess-- feeding us and giving us coffee and water and a place to smoke nervously. Why didn't we get a picture of Pam?

If you want to learn more about color grading (a.k.a., color correction) Fini has a podcast, a blog, a newsletter, and online training.

Thanks to Fini, "Bridge of Names" looks as good as it possibly can.

Since I shot it, modesty prevents me from saying more, but I think it looks pretty damn good.

If I were immodest, I'd say it looks beautiful.

- PH

P.S. The photos above, as you may have guessed, were not color graded by Fini.

Friday, May 27, 2011

A love note to the AF100

Photo by Zak Forsman

I love the waveform monitor, which you can see pictured above.

Those wavy lines aren't an x-ray of the subject. They're a scatter chart of all the pixels in the image, arranged according to brightness (luminance.)

When I've got the camera pointed at, for example, an actor in front of the sky, the "sky pixels" will most likely be at the upper end of the waveform diagram.

If they are at or above the thick line at the top, which is 100 IRE, the camera records the pixels as white.

If I wanted to see details in the clouds, I'd probably have to decrease the amount of light entering the camera by stopping down (increasing the f-stop) and putting an ND (neutral density) filter in front of the lens.

Now the clouds will look darker, with more detail than just white. Of course my actor will likely be underexposed (too dark.)

The waveform monitor gives me confidence in analyzing what the camera is recording, so that I don't have to rely only on what the camera's little LCD monitor looks like, which can be misleading.

It still comes down to taste, though. You can't be bullied by what the waveform likes, because you can wind up with bland imagery that way.

Ideally you've got a field monitor (I'm in love with our 17" Panasonic, which actually has its own waveform monitor, but that's another love note) so that you can see exactly what you're getting, and use your eye and the data to achieve beauty.

Love this feature.

- PH